Search results

Come on, that’s a bit sensitive. If Dunk felt the need to have a word then you can’t blame others (fans) for also commenting, particularly the ones at the game. The crowd has such an important role to play in giving our players the freedom to take risks. It’s not a big deal but you can’t expect...

Yeah, but the players seem to understand….against all the odds… Ps and on a serious note, nobody takes IQ tests anymore as they are meaningless as a measure of intelligence. We have moved on from the 1960s.

He wasn’t solving the same problem. At Man U they looked like scoring 2 or 3 goals in those first 20 minutes. He had a defensive problem to solve and quickly. Sounds like at Bournemouth there wasn’t much fundamental that needed changing so it was just a case of having patience with the method...

I get that which is why I have liked your post. I think this kind of football and this manager is going to need backing though. So much of what we are seeing is psychology and the crowd has a part to play in the mind games almost regardless of how well things are going. If it’s not working for...

Fair enough. I wasn’t at the game. It was a genuine question. There are better ways of expressing it though. so it was YOU !!!!

There’s several posters on this thread saying it happened and Dunk reportedly also remonstrated with them. I still don’t see the connection with RDZ’s attacking substitutions and I certainly don’t think he would want players abused by the crowd for carrying out his instructions.

How are the two substitutions made by RDZ connected to abuse thrown at Verbruggen ?

Joined in 2004 so I doubt it. It was a bit of an insulting OP but I guess it is an indication of our future when our fortunes drift the other way.

It’s such a shallow stand though (as is the South). I’ve only been in there once and stood a couple of rows from the back. Still seemed very close to the pitch which isn’t a great view behind a goal.