Search results

I didn’t cherry pick anything, that table was published today by the BBC. :D

I never said you did, in fact you quoted me.

Oddly enough, I don’t stop and consider which team someone supports before replying to a post. Some of you should try it sometime.

I’ve never steered clear of the subject on here, but I may have pointed out that by far the biggest loser from administration, was Simon Jordon. Talking about steering clear of a subject, care to explain why running a wage bill of around 138% of takings was just fine, but 80% is unsustainable?

Yes of course he did. :D I’m really starting to annoy you now? Ah, bless you for being such a cute newbie on here, it’s touching

How so? What relevance has that point to an observation that, just maybe, it would be odd for fans of one club, who were recently spending nearly 140% of their income on wages, to rip the piss out of a club for spending 80% of their income?

As it happens, whatever ‘Skool’ I attended, at least I was educated enough to know how to spell dichotomy correctly. Go wipe the egg off your face before everyone else reads your post.

So all of you slagging off Palace for spending around 80% of their income on player wages think that is immoral and unethical? That looks like 138% of income spent on wages. Obviously that’s morally and ethical different.:)

I can’t believe Ernest posted that unless he was being IRONIC.

I laughed, it was funny. Given the chance, I’d do the same.