Search results

I can kill two birds with one stone there :thumbsup:

Aged 29 each, Halford and Colunga were the only players we signed that could be described as around 30. Your point still doesn't stand up.

That's a very different complaint to signing new players in the twilight of their careers. Bruno played almost every single game under Hughton and his standard of performance was rarely anything to complain about. Rosenior has likely now taken his place as the starting RB so Bruno will still be...

According to Wikipedia (I know, not always the most reliable) McCourt made ten league appearances whilst Hughes also appeared ten times in the league and played three league cup matches. I know our squad isn't the youngest, but to suggest it's something of a club policy to sign older players is...

McCourt and Hughes were the only two players aged 30 or over that we signed permanently last season. Bent and Al-Habsi were 30 and 32 respectively and played a grand total of 6 matches between them.

Link?

What we'd actually offer/have offered is not in the public domain, that figure is based upon pure speculation. I don't claim to know any of the inner workings of transfers, I'm talking from a purely footballing sense and from that perspective, the deal makes sense.

I've said it before and I'll say it again, for a 3rd or 4th choice striker we could do a lot, LOT worse than Bobby Zamora. Sign him up.

Sounds more like Stoke under Pulis. The current Stoke stuck three past Spurs and Arsenal and smashed Liverpool by a five goal margin, very different under Hughes.

Okay now this is bandied around as gospel by some on here but what he actually said was: 'For so many years football has been your life and it’s all everyone wants to talk about, everywhere you go. I don’t like talking about it. I’m not a massive football fan, really. Quite a lot more players...