I think this is the interesting part of your post. It speaks of NATO as if it is one sentient being, who CHOSE to go towards Russia. That is very much the Russian narrative, this paranoia about a faceless giant force that is poised to invade them at any moment.
I don't see it that way. I see...
Unless he convinces them that Nato is going to kill them soon anyways? He's pushed paranoia re: NATO massively in Russia, if we then do something that appears aggressive then it will all appear to be true and justified. They're going to kill us anyway? Might as well take them with us! Etc.
Hence why I mentioned anything perceived as an attack by NATO would also galvanise his followers, and those in the chain of command with re: pressing the button.
I agree, but if he's going out, why wouldn't he choose to go out with a bang?
Leave him with nothing to lose, and there's no reason for him not to press the button. All of his paranoia would appear justified, potentially galvanising his followers. Suddenly the big red button becomes much more...
If we called his bluff and he backed down, he would be ousted from power and probably dead within weeks if not days. It would be one of the most cowardly moves from a Russian leader in centuries.
He's in a position now with no off ramp. Any escalation he is absolutely forced to match.
What do...
I'm sure someone will be along at some point to patronisingly tell me that this actually proves that Russia is winning, and I'm triggered (and probably woke as well, that usually gets thrown in) for thinking otherwise.
“We were able to find the right approach to the man,” he told the news outlet.
“We were able to create conditions to get his whole family out undetected, and eventually create the conditions so that he could take over this aircraft with a crew that did not know what was happening.
“Two more...