Search results

What a strange response given the weight of evidence on this thread. What's stranger still is that you waste your time on it given that, according to you, it's full of absolutely nothing. Your options appear to be to ignore our players' injury situation, or find an alternative source of information.

CJ can speak for himself, but I didn't read him as ascribing to you what you've indicated. Rather, I suspect CJ was ascribing generally to the numerous comments that appear on this thread to the effect that what CH says about player injuries is wrong. I'm certainly of the view that this thread...

Yawn

Yawn

There was an article about him in The Argus yesterday (I think).

THIS

That certainly was the impression that at least one of Hughton and Bruno gave in that interview they did with Sky after West Ham (which is on Player).

I suspect he'll start.

It'll be one of the two full backs that we've had on the bench of late.

Ditto. And to think that many posters on here liken Jem's output to Pravda. Apologies should be forthcoming.

It is. But '"likely" to be available after the international break' is hardly the most informative comment available. It indicates that the two players have a probability of continuing their current careers.

Of that 18, I can name 17: Ryan, Button Montoya, Duffy, Balogun, Bong, Bernardo, Suttner Knockaert, Jahanbakhsh, Propper, Stephens, Kayal, Bissouma, March Murray, Locadia Injured: Bruno, Dunk, White, Izquierdo, Andone

I think you'll find that the entire point of this thread is to show just how much of what Chris tells the media bears close resemblance to reality, or I might just have mistaken the OP's intentions.