Search results

He's not like Tex at all. I can see him playing alongside Hemed, Zamora or Baldock, and playing up front on his own. So he's an adaptable striker, not an attacking midfielder more suited to playing in the three of a 4-2-3-1 formation, which is what Tex is.

I do follow United. Yes, he is good. No, he's not similar to Bamford. Only time will tell if he's better. He's extremely quick, and has a prodigious work rate. His movement is extremely good as well, although this has been said by me and others about Lingard several times on this forum, and...

Thank you for this symbol -- # -- which is time-consuming for me to get my mitts on. I'm sure you know, but the great man himself coined #blameStockdale. It's a popular theme with some on here, but not with me. I'm of the view that he's one of the best in the Championship (which is not to say he...

Fair play. I'm willing to be hoisted but, without wanting to appear ultra-defensive: -- I was making no claim to certainty -- Plooks' comment doesn't undermine my suggestion (which is something different to a claim) about misses, which I did explain what I understood by the term in the post...

Not so sure this is the case, especially if by miss you mean, miss the target, but willing for you to show some stats bolstering the claim.

Which is why Calleri would be so good, however unlikely. Perhaps Bolanos might be the answer too, but that one's far more of a might.

Me too