Search results

I think this is crudely already handled through the varied taxation rates for high earners. Don't forget that the 40% and 45% tax brackets are aimed at ensuring those who can contribute more, do so.

The whole point of the NHS is the provision of free healthcare for all. If high earners were restricted from using the service then how could we demand they contribute to the financing of it? It would be counter productive as they seldom use the service anyway.

Because he contributes a fair proportion of his earnings to National Insurance system. He earns more and contributes more. However, most investment companies offer their staff private healthcare insurance. So he probably pays for an NHS system he doesn't use as often as the average man on the...

You obviously don't realise that half of all the money spent on R&D in the UK is done so by the pharmaceutical industry. Costs for medicines are high because there is a huge failure rate In the process of coming up with new efficacious drugs, these costs need to be factored into the price of...

It needs to be run by private companies, operating services on a tariff basis, funded centrally by the government. This would improve efficiency and remove the wasted money spent on arse covering middle and senior public sector management, the money saved then diverted back to frontline...