Search results

The alphabet spaghetti of identity/ minority politics. The gender-specific groupings that doesn't include S = straight/the vast majority. As I have said more than once no problem them setting up a new group but the all encompassing only three relevant letters needed BHA supporters club have...

Well I do ... but you have predictably categorized my pov to fit a convenient strawman template. I have said the new group is free to set up my only quibble is asking what they think they could achieve as a new grouping under a specific gender identity banner instead of part of the wider BHA...

Of course, you won't. But humour me what was the all-inclusive BHA supporters club not doing that meant we needed a smaller gender-specific group to progress a legitimate cause?

My point, which you won't address is .. What was the all-inclusive BHA supporters club not doing that meant we needed a smaller gender specific group to progress a legitimate cause?

'We would like to welcome anyone who identifies as LGBTQ+' ? The question remains .. What was the all-inclusive BHA supporters club not doing that meant we needed a smaller gender specific group to progress a legitimate cause?

Piss poor reasoning ... the KKK bothers you, so it's needed?

My opinion is .. what value or progression of a cause can be ascertained by setting up a new smaller gender-specific group where a previous diverse gender neutral group (#together) has already identified and championed an injustice with some positive results...

The all-inclusive / non-discriminatory BHA Supporters club has already highlighted the issue of homophobic abuse on numerous occasions. This issue has increased in importance and more action has been taken. The new LGBQT+ group that has arrived after we achieved Prem status are obviously free to...