Search results

He gave me confidence, I thought he was great for us. I wouldn't have swapped Steele in for him, that decision filled me with dread. I thought Steele was utterly hopeless. Just as well I'm not a manager I guess. I also disagreed with signing Duffy, selling knockhaert, and forcing Murray out. 1...

How can I change my user name to:- 'Sanchez would have saved that (from the bench)'?

Now I'm genuinely confused and am starting to think that these are not all spoof posts. Or is it Bob? But surely only one can be Bob? Bit naughty if there are multiple accounts at play - just the sort of thing big Bob would do, the bastard!

But at least he reconsidered and came back for the good of the thread - put the lolz first.

Erm.....

I wasn't saying otherwise. He's very good keeper but the suggestion that refusing to be part of the squad is OK was one of the odder things I've read on this forum. There's a lot of competition for such an accolade too!

Oh that's OK then. Refusing to sit on the bench and be there for his team mates is no issue at all if he was prepared to play if selected to play. What was all the fuss about then? All RDZ needed to do was to bench Steele, problem solved!

If he refuses to play, refuses to abide by the companies policies and rules etc then he wouldn't be in a position to tear up his contract. Who knows what conditions are in each players contract but if players could just refuse to play and still get paid then forcing a departure would be far...

Perhaps Potter put up with pricks? Doesn't help if it's not addressed