Search results

But this is, in part, how loyalty points work. If you spend more at Tesco you get more points. Business class seats get your more air miles than economy etc. I do feel there is justification for rewarding those who spend more at the Albion. But I think the level of benefit is too high.

Bozza's example suggests a 1901er with no away games can be ahead of a regular ST who regularly attends 10 aways. If I have misunderstood this I apologise. But if it's correct it does seem unfair and weighted heavily in favour of 1901ers irrespective of cash paid or length of commitment. No...

This isn't the debate though. It's the level of benefit. A 1901er with no away games has higher priority than a regular ST holder who repeatedly goes to 10 always. Doesn't seem fair.

It's a new season, new and very different division to any we have played in before, so there is a chance for the club to revisit the loyalty points scheme which is weighted heavily in 1901ers favour. Let's see.

Unfortunately modern football values money over pretty much everything else.

Your latter point is not a bad idea actually. After all, one gets loyalty points in many other retail operations.

I think Old Trafford etc will be attractive wherever we are in the league.

How does this work with company owned 1901 tickets?

I guess so. Some 1901 tickets are in company names; I wonder how this works if you get ID-ed at an away game.

I agree it seems unfair that someone who hasn't been to a single away game can trump someone with many games under their belt. I think the loyalty scheme has worked well so far but this was in the context of The Championhip....it seemingly needs a tweak now.