Search results

So speaks the decent person. You may or may not agree with what I write: that is your right, but I am not an idiot, any more than you are. But at least I can avoid insults when all else fails . .

The problem with your posts that they invariably involve sweeping generalisations, just like on another thread when you describe others en masse as fools. So you cannot be surprised that you are picked up on the fact that you seem to be tarring everyone with the same brush, even if, as you say...

I accept what you say and that we all recognise that in any organisation there will be "rotten eggs". That is not to say that that view of the Police in general is fair or reasonable. No one thinks that all police officers behave in an unprofessional way, even if a small minority do.

Well, if you have no idea, might it be better if . . .

Really? You began by generalising about the police when you wrote this: "Yeah I'm no big fan of the police and the way they do things." I asked you to elaborate and you wrote this: "I can't unfortunately. Suffice to say, some of them will think nothing of stitching people up and causing untold...

The original claim was that they would happily stitch someone up due to wishing to further their own career and personal vanity. This is rather vague but I took it to mean that the poster meant that they would happily frame a totally innocent person just to "prove" that they are doing their job...

That is a far cry from your irresponsible generalisation of a few posts back. It may be as you describe, but I am sure that this applies to a very small minority.

Absolutely. You carry a gun around, you do it at your risk. Everyone knows the stakes.

care to elaborate?

I wonder what your reaction would be if you were in a shopping mall, and saw someone walking along holding a gun, but of course there was no intent, was there? Bet you would scream for the Police.