But, as has been mentioned, there was no religious connotation. Nor is there any evidence that it was because the victims were scantily dressed. Although there has been nothing confirmed, the cause of the incident seems to be an argument between two families from neighbouring holiday homes...
But who says it's because they were scantily dressed. The examining magistrate, who's at the scene and has, presumably, questioned witnesses says that it's not clear what the motive for the attack is but you, hundreds of miles away, assume that it's because the victims were scantily dressed.
As...
Did no-one read the links "The motive for the attack is very fuzzy ... but no words of religious connotation were spoken."?
Of course, further details may emerge later but people are jumping the gun a bit