Yep, I agree that the title isn't great. Personally, I tend not to amend thread titles, except for updates to an ongoing saga - perhaps around a potential signing, say. Perhaps that's just a personal foible...
Good idea; highly manual process though. You volunteering?
We do have an automatic system whereby the first n posts made by a new account have to be approved by a mod before going live. This system was introduced around the time of the Boro infestation about 2 years ago, so before the OP...
Not the individual I had in mind when I made the comment, but certainly a great orator, so definitely important to evaluate the content of his speeches too.
Yes - the seemingly deliberate “agenda to inflame, antagonise and divide” of a handful of posters does, imo, go against the raison d’être of NSC. Against that, one has to weigh free speech.
Posting history plays a part for me: some folk post on football and start seemingly deliberately...
In general, yep, I agree. One caveat: a great orator can persuade joe public of the merits of his/her ideas, irrespective of the validity of the content. It’s important to always evaluate the content of what is being promoted, and not just get carried away by the emotional impact of great oratory.
johanngull This is how you should be showing your support for Tommy Robinson. There’s just no need for your misdirection; it’s really tacky.
Alf knows I profoundly disagree with a lot of what he says, and we’ve had the odd run in when I think he’s overstepped the line of acceptability, but you...
His last sentence is misdirection, im afraid; he supports the DM. He’s using the misdirection to get a video of Tommy Robinson on the BB.
Quite why he feels the need to obscure his feelings on the subject is beyond me.