Search results

I've not said that I think Dunk has refused to play. I was simply responding to a post that said that Hughton has said that Dunk will be "involved" tonight, which I've not seen him say - s'all.

Did he? I've seen that Hughton said he'd be "available", which isn't the same thing...

Until the clubs (note the plural) one day decide enough is enough. Nah, you're right...can't see it happening :nono:

Setting a bad precedent was always going to end in tears. I'm not suggesting that Dunk is behaving badly, but it is inevitable that someone will (or has) as a result of previous weakness. Sometimes, you just have to dig your heels in...pour encourager les autres.

Damn, I edited my initial response just too late, obviously. You are, of course, entirely correct...

...nope... you are referring to publishing of the team sheets.... :thumbsup:

Yep - if he isn't playing or on the bench then the statement is quite probably true. Unless, of course, he's just "picked up a minor knock in training"...

Hmmm. Well, there's certainly a lot of stuff about Murphy. I've thought for a while that Dunk would be leaving us this window; if he does go, I do hope he leaves with dignity. Ulloa managed it excellently; Bridcutt didn't.

That's quite the accusation - tarring him with the same brush as Bridcutt. How reliable is your source?