Search results

I've explained my view earlier that the club haven't been underhand. On the contrary, they've abided by the law and the Articles in a confidential, professional way. Perhaps you could explain how you think they've been underhanded?

See earlier post for more detail.

Maybe. I know that was the club's line, but it isn't a requirement in law that all Directors are shareholders. There is however some evidence that private companies are increasingly expecting their Directors to do so (to give some indication that all Directors' interests are aligned with the...

The club have been piggy in the middle throughout all of this, with some fans (fanned by some of DK's comments) erroneously believing that the club have blocked the sale - there is precisely zero evidence of this, except some innuendo/ unsupported assertions by DK. The club are required, by...