Search results

Fair enough! Thanks. I do wish the club would use more than just Twitter to report material things - it's not on the website or on player. Perhaps that's all there is to it then.... ..or perhaps he has both picked up a knock and is also going... (which, to be clear is not accusing the club...

I'm not! The article doesn't quote the club either. Has the club or any employee of the club said anywhere that Leo has an injury? The Argus has made an assertion with no quotes. Obviously they will have had a source, but that source hasn't been quoted, so the club can say that the Argus was...

There's no reason for him not to do pre-season training, and, afaik, he has participated in all sessions. However, if his departure were to be imminent, both clubs may not want to take the risk of him getting injured in a match. If any deal were not close, you'd think that getting match...

I hadn't seen that article - thanks. A semantic point - I don't see anywhere in it that says that Sami told the Argus that...there are no quotes, just assertions from Owen. It may be that all is well and that Leo isn't going anywhere, but I don't believe that to be true. We'll see.

That's true, but if he wanted to play down any rumour, he could have said "Yes, both were injury-related and were unable to play". Surely that would be the natural reaction to a question about their injury status? Instead, we got: Q: Leo and Kaz not playing - injury-related? A: "Both were not...

Indeed. he looked away while he thought about what answer he was going to give to the question about Kaz and Leo. He was given the option of answering "yes" when asked if their absence was "injury-related". Instead, he answered "Both were not able to play today, and that's it". :(