Search results

No they don't. The power is now too entrenched with the people that run it. Starting again with a clean sheet would be fine - even if it started with a breakaway, which may split the unity of one organisation for all for a time - but gradually the nations sticking with the old could change and...

No - it'd be a new house.

Yes, one of those, but a different one.

That's what I said - FIFA, the slimey ****s, managed to do just that.

See my post above yours - FIFA contrived to isolate and individually bully the national FAs. If the seven had stood together as a bloc, and said no to FIFA, would FIFA have caved in when faced with a prospect of a quarter of the teams walking out?

I do wonder how seemingly FIFA managed to seperate the countries that wanted to display the armband and threaten them individually, thus ensuring they caved in. A sticking together by seven countries (with the possibility of one or two more, like the USA and Australia joining them) threatening...

Well, you denigrated the appropriateness of two basically socially progressive western nations, with no medieval laws about sexuality or women's rights, so the suggestion is that that you might prefer the alternative. Or the institutionally (as far as football is concerned) corrupt Swiss world...

You think Qatar, Russia and the Saudis would be better for the job? ....... or gawd help us, the Swiss?

Ooh goodie! - in that case can we put our towels on the sun-loungers for the 2066 one then??

Leave FIFA? Fine by me. International football disrupted and in chaos for a few years? :shrug: No problem. Personally I'd have loved to have seen what happened if the seven countries that wanted to wear the armband that would have devastated poor distraught Qataris had turned round to FIFA and...