Search results

Yes, but it was your reasoning that was wrong! I didn't need to be told we currently have two excellent back up CBs, I already knew! Anyway, enough! Here you are, a present from me especially for you........... The Last Word. Treasure it!

You disagree, that's fair enough. I happen to disagree with you too. So why, when my post stated exactly why I'd have liked us to go for Tomori, couldn't you just say you disagreed, instead of pointing out that we have two players to cover at CB (which I already knew)? All you needed to say was...

You said we have two good players covering at CB. I agree, we do, but in the right hand side of my post (or the second sentence, if you prefer - the one you don't appear to have read) it explained exactly where Tomori would fit in. He would have replaced the out-on-loan Goldson who would have...

Do you not read the right hand side of posts, or what?

Yes, shame we couldn't get him again this season, IMHO. Apart from anything else, it could have solved the getting-Goldson-out-on-loan-to-get-some-game-time problem. ......and, in reply to the OP question, my answer is Loftus-Cheek.