No dispute whatsoever with the validity of either statement. Just the fact that one person seems to be unable to understand the fact that both sentences are double negatives (as posted in my reply). He was trying to say that Halbro's statement as quoted in the first quote in post #147 was not a...
So 'won't' and 'no trains' -- won't is negative, no is negative = 2 negatives. The positive without two negatives is 'will be' instead of 'won't be no'.
Second sentence 'don't' is negative and 'not' is negative = 2 negatives. The positive is 'will run' trains instead of 'don't ...not run...