Search results

I ate all of mine reading this thread.

Hot chocolate and Bovril is going to be my next submission to the Viz Profanisaurus.

Racist x

Too busy texting to eat.

By all means have a go at the club for banning flasks, although I think it’s a fuss about nothing. However there’s no evidence that the motive is financial. If PB’s aim was to maximise income and cut costs that things like AITC would have been binned off ages ago as it’s a significant cost for...

I did for Pride, but was still arrested.

You said it was for one reason REVENUE. If so, why wait until we are in the 7th/8th year at the Amex and making over £100m a year from TV monies and now making a profit, when the ban could have been introduced years ago when the club was losing money hand over fist, if all the club was...

BG on the button as always. How many people take a flask to the game, probably no more than 50. Multiply that by one cuppa at £2.20, of which profit is say £1.50. Multiply that by 19 home matches = £1,425 a season, which for a business turning over £135,000,000 a year is significant.

If I was a Palace fan feeling hacked off at seeing my team lose last night and the Albion win on Sunday, this thread would have cheered me up no end.