Search results

If that happens then I'll happily join the Corruption Crew

The first one, maybe. But not the second one. It's not a grey area. A goal that is scored off the penalising area of the arm is automatic handball. I would have been fecking fuming if that wasn't chalked off.

I'd say 'bad' decisions but not corrupt. As I said, I don't know about the first Mitoma one, so leave that to the experts. The MAC one is only being contested by those who don't know the rules. The stamp on Mitoma was a clear penalty. So it may be that there was one bad VAR. But it's an issue...

VAR tends to work on 'Umpire's Call' though. Had the ref given the Mitoma stamp it would have been passed. They would have been forced to review and prove otherwise. The problem is Attwell is unsighted so VAR needs clear evidence, On this occasion there is. So can't be explained. I didn't see...

Peter Walton on the Mitoma stamp. 'It's a penalty kick, I can't defend it'

Does Kane not know you don't pretend to be injured when It's your own player who has fouled you ?

No problem with the ref not giving that penalty, but VAR has had a howler there.

That was a penalty. I'd like to hear the logic behind that.

The goal was disallowed for a clear handball. Regardless of whether his arm was in a natural position or not, if it leads to a goal it has to be chalked off. I'd be fuming if that was allowed against us.

Not when a goal is scored. It becomes hand ball regardless.

My worry against this lot is that however much better we play they have class in their side. Must stay focussed like the first half. They can be beaten, but we need a perfect half.

Yes, every referee and VAR official is biased against us. It's the reason why we are as low as 6th.