Search results

And he is quite right.

I can see that argument. It just seems a rather simple solution that is worth a try. If it does not work - then little is lost.

If you do not see there being a problem then the do-nothing option is fine. And you can comfort yourself that adding an additional person to an interview list is discriminatory. If you see there being a problem then positive action is best taken. And the experience of the NFL over a ten year...

And this helps along that way. All is being done is that an additional person is being interviewed. Voices are heard that are not being heard at the moment. No-one has to give a job to anyone.

You may theorise all you wish. It has been shown to work in the real world. So why not try it?

Double post.

So if the dice are loaded it is discrimination to make the game more even? Can't see that myself.

The Rooney Rule worked in the States, and the same arguments against were used. I don't see why it is different here. Try it. What is there to lose?