Search results

And that shirt tug was far more of a penalty. Why was that not referred if you want consistency? The answer really should be neither should have been referred as neither was clear and obvious. Just let the ref get on with it unless it's an absolute clanger.

How? How on earth did he deliberately handle the ball? It HAS to be deliberate and that's before we even cross the "clear and obvious error" debate.

Extraordinary decision for me. At best it's not clear and obvious, never deliberate and one million times less a penalty than those England should have had.