Search results

I grasped it very early on - best to be a bit like CH and never get too high when we are doing well or too low when we are on a bad run.

Ha ha wonderful. So when we do well we are in a false position, when we do badly they just aren't good enough. Perhaps the obvious truth is that we were neither world beaters when we were 9th and we are not "not good enough" when we are on a bad run? We are one of the teams battling to avoid...

Were they good enough when we were 9th? Or will they be good enough all over again when we next win?

And it may happen next week as well, maybe even the week after too but this sort of thread just does my head in. I should just ignore it really but it highlights all that's bad about our supporters.

Because this sort of dumb ass, knee jerk question comes up every time we are losing. Do you think after one (admittedly appalling) half we should suddenly start questioning Hughton's ability? What happens if we win at Spurs, do we stop the questioning and then start again when we lose the next...

It's not even vaguely a valid question in spite of what's happening on the pitch.

No, he gets tested every week and has done OK wouldn't you say? We are appalling so far today but that will happen from time to time.