Search results

With over 80,000 civil servants working in London 5% still represents over 4,000 joining the “travelling circus”!

Yes it does work for the EU - At a price! Seeing as the most economical option for carrying out the necessary maintenance of the Palace of Westminster will mean it being out of action for a number of years, what is there to prevent the changes, (which I incidentally agree are desirable), from...

What appears to be being missed by those in favour of moving Parliament is the difference between Parliament and government. All the major ministries are based in London including Downing Street. Decisions will still be made in London.

Where do you get the idea that landlords see a return of 30% on capital. If you have the means anyone can buy a property as an investment and rent it out. Then there is the problem of renting a property for a maximum of £1,900 a month in London and finally London MPs don’t qualify for...

MPs get accommodation costs, hotel or a rented property - they no longer get an allowance to buy a second home. These allowances are up to £1,900 a month in London or £1,400 outside. So the maximum saving would be £500 per month per MP. There are over 70 London MPs who would be claiming these...

No - no - no! The Palace of Westminster is of historic importance and will need just as much spent to preserve it whether or not the Commons sit there. Why therefore spend additional millions on a new Parliament? As for whether or not the voting procedures are changed is different question...