Search results

It's all very well saying that under FFP clubs can invest in infrastructure such as a new ground but our own recent experiences have shown that whilst the capital cost of such 'improvements' does not count against the FFP figures the initial start up and running costs do and these can be...

Wrong way round - the League changed the rules, (under pressure from the PL) - it was up to them to gain the clubs approval.

So by your argument, where there are agreed rules but no penalties then it is perfectly OK to ignore those rules! The rules with regard to fines for promoted teams and where those fines were to be distributed were changed unilaterally, without any reference to those voting for them, by the...

The rules were in place - what they, and us, took advantage of was the fact that there were no penalties for breaking those rules - not quite the same thing!

Leicester City are a prime example of the irrelevancy of FFP and club stability. They spectacularly failed the FFP requirements in the 2012/2013 season by announcing losses of £34 million - in December last year however the owners wiped out the clubs £103 million pound debt by converting it...

Exactly the same argument the unions used to use over the 'closed shop'.

Not a real choice though - is it? ???

Only 10 of the 24 current Championship teams took part in that vote.