Search results

Downs have to play their part? Eh? What does that mean? Sorry this whole idea is daft and will do next to nothing in reducing greenhouse gases which is the ultimate aim here. As I have stated there are many more ways of producing clean energy and reducing greenhouse gases. This is nothing more...

Well no, originally it would have been Molton lava and then after that seabed, but I can't see anyone trying to recreate those environments. Come on mate, if it's been the way it is for 800 years, I think it's worth keeping it that way. BUT then again plant some trees because as I said earlier...

It's a much cleaner way to make bio diesel than before. The using of rubbish and waste increases it's clean properties. My point being that there are better things to spend money on for the long term goal of a clean environment than wind farms.

Well that's what was said and I guess it hit home because I always remember it. Also you have to remember that the acre of forest that is cut remains cut...as in forever. So assuming a lifetime is 70years, the cut rainforests impact is forever. Sort of makes sense to me. Either way it is the...

I actually heard it from Sir Paul McCartney at a UN seminar on the environment a few years back. I have no idea if the statement was 100% accurate. Yet what is undeniable is that deforestation is the biggest source of global warming by a million miles. A few wind farms will do next to nothing in...

Not sure what I think about this. I can't say I'm pleased as I think they look bloody awful. How much energy they really make is also up for debate. There are much more windy and remote places to put this farm. I mean the sea isn't restricted like land so the possibilities must be almost...