Search results

Weak? There's really no need to get all defensive again. All I did was express surprise that you appeared to be cherry-picking articles. You've confirmed my suspicions, it's all good. I'd probably hold back though on unilaterally declaring it the final word though. But that's just me. :thumbsup:

But I thought the Guardian were full of flustered Blairites. Most confusing. It's as if you dismiss the newspaper as biased when they print headlines you don't like but you happily quote them when they print the stuff you do like.

I'm not a sceptic and my comments about David M and David D were purely about electability (is that a word?).

Advice? Even the semi-official Labour Party organ, the New Statesman refers to it as an 'attack' in their headlines and in the article...innovative policies are being 'crushed at the centre' and welfare announcements are 'cynical and punitive'. With friends like Jon... Ah. The Guardian is full...

Perhaps someone should tell Jon Cruddas, Labour's head of policy this good news then. He's positively scathing about about Miliband's leadership. http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2014/06/cruddass-attack-has-raised-bar-miliband And whilst they're at it, they might want to inform the Guardian...

I thought he was referring to the council. If so, then I agree with The Birdman - I think they will get hammered in the next local elections and rightly so. The Greens have been nothing short of a shambles. However, like you, I hope that Lucas retains her seat regardless of the local party or...