Search results

Tarmac rules :jester:

Will it ? It appears on the information out there that this is very uncertain.

That's just an opinion though. I have yet to see any evidence of it.

No evidence of arrogancy at all.

Of course it's not on the red button, but this one is right up there with the worst in a long list of Brighton and Hove planning lunancy.

Just 3 public objections and they turn it down. More lunacy from Brighton and Hove planning.

Which is financially viable and practical you mean ?

So there is plan B, and Perry was fibbing ? ???

Sadly there is no plan B.

How odd that he knows it is coming back, and if it does that it'll be approved.

Do you know the reasons why a redesign or flexibility over the 106 were not possible / viable ? ??? How do you know it is arrogance ? ???

Will it ? ???

Doesn't the hotel design blend in perfectly with the university box buildings next to the stadium ? ???

Well, let's not forget their history was to hang their case on any angle to object that they could think of. Bat / Car collisions etc. So any reason for objection just serves the overall strategy of objecting really.

It hasn't been voted on yet, anyway. This is the council civil servants who recommend refusal.

The council tax is clearly too high if they can fritter it away on this sort of thing.