Search results

I always though that was the case until the Iraq War. When Blair said that they had evidence of Saddam's "Weapons of Mass Destruction", he was backed by the leader of the opposition. I assumed that the evidence was shared (as it was such an important decision). It wasn't.

He didn't know for sure. It could even be the Russian government but you couldn't rule anything out!

Not enough evidence. Ken felt that there was a good chance that the chemicals could have been sold to a third party in the Yeltsin years. It will probably be repeated on Russia Today.

Not working today. Watching RT, Ken Livingstone is not happy about it. Listening to Jeremy Vine earlier, George Galloway - who works for RT, was not happy. I will let people draw their own conclusions.