Search results

The Warne Murali debate is a good one. There are pros and cons either way Warne was a much better all round cricketer than Murali. If Murali had spent most of his career playing outside the spin friendly subcontinent like Warne did I don't think he'd have got as many wickets. **I was looking...

I've had this debate with my uncle who remembers watching Sobers play at sussex in county cricket, he picks Sobers every time. He also plays the Kapil Dev card as well! It's always been difficult to compare different eras in cricket, I just think you can't argue with the stats in this case...

Batsman - toss up between tendulkar and Lara Bowler - warne All rounder - for me kallis is probably the best all rounder ever, once he retires I'm sure he'll be viewed as such