Search results

How come as its only 1631 now or was that 1745 yesterday.

possibly but that is my opinion right or wrong.

No because it is predominantly a female sport not exclusive and males can play it to a proficient standard. Ladies should be playing stoolball not cricket. This thread has become completely distracted by the fact of 1 person suggesting all teams contain 1 woman and I disagreed and people...

I consider it to be 'unlady like' to take part in the sports that I mentioned.

in my younger days I qualified as a ref and absolutely hated it.

Also put an outfield player already on the pitch to stop a team bringing on a keeper on 78 mins on the field in preparation for the 10 minutes. So no GK subs after 60 mins.only like for like due to injury. I am sure that Guardiola would bring on a sub keeper on 78 mins and play him outfield...

I believe that multi ball should be used in ALL matches to speed up the time a throw in is taken. While I am at it I believe that we should revert to the old rule of switching the throw if taken from the wrong place.

I didnt suggest that each team should include 1 female. As it happens I thought that last nights match was one of the most boring for many a year. Very little skill or endeavor showed by either team until they brought on Austin and Redmond.and what did we counter that with nothing.

it may exist but that is where the comparison ends. IMHO Perhaps my attitude would vary if either of my granddaughters wanted to play football but at the moment I do not agree with Ladies Football at any level.

Probably not as most females cant, proficiently,.if your level of proficiency is Non League Premier (Burgess Hill) or above.

Div 1 and Div 2 teams in the 1st round Championship clubs added in the 2nd round and Premier clubs in the 3rd. All teams must play 7 players who have appeared in 75% of games in the season fpor 3rd round onwards.