Search results

I think he's suggesting that we must go for an improved GD, but not recognising that this is a valid, but secondary goal. As far as I can work out, he has offered zero suggestions as to what Chris and the team might do differently to achieve this secondary goal, whilst others have correctly...

I suspect your lack of understanding of my posts is more your problem than mine... others seem to understand where I am coming from... still, carry on with your pathetic personal attack on me, if you must... in the meantime, our beloved club will, I'm sure, continue to strive for points first...

Just a reminder of the absolute sh1te you posted at the start of this thread... me pointing out to you that points are more important than GD, is so obvious, but also so true... just because it is obvious, doesn't make it stupid to point out your logic fail...

Actually, your thread (you initiated this with you 'blisteringly insightful' original post) makes no sense at all, as you now seem to realise, you absolute melt... or do you?

Look, it is obviously better to have a higher positive GD, but it is more important to secure 3 points for a win (again, obviously), so let's recognise these facts, and not go for the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th goal (more than opposition), at the possible expense of losing points (over-emphasising...

So nobody said we are home and dry then? And the table takes account of points 1st, GD as a secondary measure, so we should continue to focus on points... end of thread...

No, secure the points... they are more important, clearly, than GD... that's how it works...

Hmmm... points over GD... it's a fact...