Search results

Just not true, I've migrated to 'clone'! ;-)

Well, my sincere apologies for my prior labelling TB.

My fairness manifests itself in recognising Gus' achievements on the pitch, whilst also noting his personality flaws, evidenced by what he said in the media when our manager.

I'm not saying it was or it wasn't!

Good assessment of the situation there. However, I feel I need to point out that there was no need for the club to trump up the gross misconduct charge (not saying you said that, just that this point is relevant). I think my 'clones' comment is relatively mild compared to the pelters that are...

To be fair, you have always said you don't trust either side. Strangely, this fairness you talk of manifests itself in you CONSTANTLY backing-up one party (Gus) over the other (the club).

Eh!? I haven't lost it like your buddy.

I'll ignore the 'erratic and confused' bit which, again, is just opinionated bile. As I said before, take it or leave it. I'm not demanding anything! However, the facts in the public domain are fully aligned with what I am claiming: that is, the gross misconduct charge is valid. In this...

This is a much more reasonable debate, despite the Gus-praising clones predicting otherwise. In response. I've seen all sorts, such as "left under a cloud", "dismissed for gross misconduct", as well as the ones you are quoting. As I said, I think this is now old news, and neither the club nor...

Sorry, I'm not going anywhere. Oh, and please feel free to hunt out my earlier post explaining why I can't divulge the details. If you understood ANY of the situation, then you could easily work out why the details MUST remain confidential.

No, there is no 'must assume I'm talking bollox'. You just chose to do so. As I've said before, take it or leave it. You've chosen to leave it. That's fine, but you should maybe consider that I (and the club BTW) might be right in saying the gross misconduct charge (which remains and will remain...

Yeah, right. We're really suffering with our record crowds, positive media commentaries, et al. To be fair, I'm sure Gus' improprieties are also yesterday's news by now.

Too right. And, it seems, some others on here too.

Really!? So now I'm 'nasty'. How do you work that out? Do you know me? And I think you'll find the usual Gus fan club are providing most of the vitriol on here (not for the first time). If you don't agree with what I'm saying, then fine, but don't just trot out bile.

I have a source. Do I really have to explain to you again why I can't share the details?

And serious anger issues.

I think you have serious trust issues.

Definitely not but Gus`rep is now tarnished.

Sadly I think he would!

Biased nonsense as always. I spent most of my time trying to explain to fans of opposing teams that it wasn't Gus who evacuated his bowels in the Palace dressing room. If anything, he was the laughing stock.