Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Search results

  1. A

    Hillsborough prosecutions

    See post 82. Counted in using the turnstile counter and then cross referenced with cctv. When they opened gate C they used the cctv to continue the counting. Whilst I accept it would not be totally accurate they would not be too far out, certainly not a 1000.
  2. A

    Hillsborough prosecutions

    In addition to my post above, it was clear that pens 3&4 were full by 2:30pm. Having opened the gates the tunnel to the central pens should have been shut off as in previous years. This basic lack of instruction was the biggest issue.
  3. A

    Hillsborough prosecutions

    But there wasn't 1000 or more ticketless fans. How difficult is it to understand? They were counted in and the upper limit was less than 50 above the capacity.
  4. A

    Hillsborough prosecutions

    In the previous link I posted, the design of the stadium and number of turnstiles meant that either of the following had to happen to let the 10,100 ticket holders into the Leppings Lane End: Delay kick off until at least 3:40pm. David Duckenfield ruled this out. Or that Liverpool fans had to...
  5. A

    Hillsborough prosecutions

    Yes, they did... http://www.hse.gov.uk/foi/releases/hillsborough/me8934.pdf
  6. A

    Hillsborough prosecutions

    https://thegreatcritique.wordpress.com/2012/10/14/hillsborough-ticketlessness-was-not-a-factor-and-this-is-how-we-know/ "This led to three possible attendance totals for the Leppings Lane terrace as a whole; – Lowest possible number… 9,267 ‘Best’ possible number… 9,734 Maximum possible...
  7. A

    Hillsborough prosecutions

    So you have made that claim without even acknowledging that the independent report and coroner clearly stated that there were no, or very few ticketless fans present? Astounding. I believe they spent days counting fans using cctv and other cameras to come up with this conclusion.
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here