Search results

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/44363648 An explanation that mitigates the performance, or a cynical attempt to protect him from critcism?

Thinking a goalkeeper needs to make more than two errors (even two major errors, even two errors that would grace those sports videos hosted by harry hill) to be considered the worst goalkeeping performance ever means I'm a troll or silly? Whatever.

I'm not denying he made mistakes, or even arguing it wasn't a bad performance. I recognise that not many people take the same perspective as me when it comes to one or two moments deciding a game. That's not what I'm arguing. We've seen keepers substituted because they have been having terrible...

Did he make any other errors other than those two goals? I know my belief that putting the result of a match on one or two moments is wrong isn't popular, but putting that aside, surely (unless I missed some other errors from him) thinking a keeper who made two errors over ninety minutes might...