Search results

Corrected for you :shrug:

More than naïve. Pathetic! Left wing attacks on labour, as per usual. Thatcher stopped councils spending what they like and sending the bill to HMG. We have a poor givernment that has done great harm in the last 14 years. And yet elements on the left seem more concerned about the possibility...

Sorry to reply to my own post but I just listened to Sunk spaking for 10 minutes. Perfectly reasonable I though. Perhaps even heartwarming and inspirational. No, I mean it. Now, whatever is behind it (some think a prelude to giving police more powers - who knows) the first talking head up on...

So, from 'all the same' to some of them on each side are decent humans? My guess is most of them in labour, tory, lib dem and green are decent. Politics is however the art of the possible. You cannot get elected if your slogan is 'no compromise with the electorate'. That does require...

A point I have made repeatedly to persons on the (far) left who have never been more angry about anything, ever, than traitor Starmer's failure to instantly, completely and utterly, and utterly completely condemn Israel for their wicked genocide that was complelety unjustified and came totally...

How on earth do you conclude that, on the back of a Lib Dem, who probably didn't expect to win first time round, deciding he'd like to fight to win the seat again? Rumour has it that a tiny percentage of aspiring parliamentarians seek to contribute to the public good. Perhaps he's one? ??? And...

I have read about him for 30 years in Private Eye. The common threads to his doings is vanity and venality. He is largely in it for the money, and has managed to monetize a range of 'plausible' activities. Like Farage, but surfing a different set of causes to make a different money-making...

Yeah, both threads have now disappeared. But I can read the posts if I look up a reply to stuff I posted on my thread. Given the jubilation from those on the right and extreme left of Starmer at Gorgeous' win, my suspicion that these types would rather see a racist elected than a labour...

You do realize the labour 'candidate' was no longer endorsed by Labour? If the 'issue' was flagged up before he was selected, please do provide a link. This is the first I have heard of this.

Indeed. The man is an absolute piece of work. Claiming that up is down to justify his choices: "Scott Long, writing in The Guardian on 31 March, criticised Galloway's claim that "homosexuals are not executed in Iran, just rapists," pointing out that current law in the country stipulates that...

How can the absolute truth, backed up by verifiable facts, be absolute bollocks? That's as stupid as me saying to you 'get off this Crystal Palace fan site'. Mate.

The other thread was started by someone I have on ignore. If you check the first post in this thread all will be revealed.

No, that would be Piss Pot.

You think Starmer 'vets' every candidate? Perhaps he does. The first we knew about the anti-Semitism of the pillock they disowned was in a sting by the Daily Mail, designed to embarrass labour and make it impossible to bounce their man. There was no way of Starmer knowing in advance the oaf was...

Don't have a go at me. I never mentioned Pol Pot :shrug:

I would very certainly shoot a messenger who has the message and keeps it till nothing useful can be done with it, other than damage the recipient

Ah yes. Indeed. One of fastest defenestrations in my history of ignoring :lolol:

Of course not. I support it too. Along with the right for Israel to exist. I assume you support Galloway.

I can only assume that a thread has been started by someone I have on ignore. Fancy that. So the Daily Mail have got Galloway back into parliament as the MP for Gaza. By storing and releasing candidate credibility-ending pro Gaza cant from the Labour candidate till it was too late for labour...