Search results

But that's the issue (for some people). VAR was meant to solve problems/errors. But, because of the subjectivity (within pundits, in this thread, everywhere), it's never going to do that. Hence the ongoing debate.

Yes, but BECAUSE it's subjective, you end up with endless debate about whether it was 'right' or 'wrong'. So it doesn't 'solve' the problem (I'm not sure it can actually be solved because of the different interpretations). I agree with you in this instance - correct decision. But Vinny...

Subjective decision - another example of why the VAR system isn't fit for purpose. I was interested to see the ex-footballers and Jules convinced it was a foul. The cynic in me reckons that they just went against the VAR to undermine it. If the decision was overturned, maybe the post-match...