Search results

I disagree. That's victim blaming.

You don't stop, do you? Abuse, psychoanalysis and a prescription. You should be working for the NHS as a mental health counsellor with that skill set. Still not managed to put a space after a full stop yet, though, I see. Do make an effort. We have standards on here :shrug: .

Crikey. Still going on, then. But I won't condemn them from earning a few quid from their celebrity, if that's what they are doing. The 'contributory negligence' narrative is false equivalence.

Well I haven't been over his utterances with a fine tooth comb and, frankly, I doubt there is a great deal for me to learn if I were to do so - I already know he's not the sharpest tool in the box, but did he ever claim to want to be anonymous and, even if he did why not close off with an Oprah...

His having a high profile should not be incompatible with his not being happy about having his phone tapped when he was at school (etc., etc.,). That sort of false equivalence is not a million miles away from the old 'contributory negligence' argument used to defend rapists when they attacked...

He did something to annoy me. Can't even remember what it was now, although I have a vague recollection of attitudes that I thought had died out with my parents' generation. But I've moved on and I don't do looking back. I'm sure most of his œuvre is fine. It is what it is.

I'm agnostic about the royals, but every word above is true. The ludicrous and offensive mockery of the man and his wife in parts of the media over the last year in particular is indefensible. Its the usual nasty bullying shits and their nasty bullying acolytes, including some who post on NSC. I...

You're wasting your breath. The white male gammon gene has overwhelmed his mind with 'f*** you' nucleotides, and 'I'm alright jack' protein.

Icy has gone mad recently. I had to put him on ignore. For his own good <sigh>