Search results

Red isn't a good colour for ginger slanted people.

Especially if it's dictated the price we can get back for them.

The only strategy we have consistently had in regards to fees is "undisclosed".

It is bad if we get 35 million and that's it. It's better if it's 45 with add ons.

Not seemingly, bargain basement price for a player of that quality and character even at 45 million. Just as Boehly paying stupid amounts of money for players is a bad look for that club, letting players go for a lot less than they are worth is also a bad look.

Because we were told by countless people on here that Ray Romano has all the good oil, never wrong. So now they're saying he's full of shit?

Always desperate money floating around in January. Chelsea spent 106 million on a WC winner and he's not even as good as Mac.

We got 27 million for an older less talented Trossard in January. We were never going to get 0 for MacAllister.

We didn't get a big fee though at 35 million. In PL money terms that's an amount that's not even close to being big for a player of that talent level. We just paid 30 million for a championship player.

Then the club needs to come out and refute it. Optics are a thing.

We don't know if they have. There is only one clown saying we got 35 million for him.

Because the whole model is based on him not having to be putting his hand in his pocket to keep us going. The money we get in for sales plays a huge part in our future success.

If we only got 35 million for one of our best players then our model will fall apart very quickly selling unders on elite players.

Exactly.

Who has a longer history of not posting false information?

Because he could have had a terrible tournament or gotten badly injured. Plenty of reasons for him to have signed a new contract that don't involve convoluted theories. And yet we have a master gambler that time and time again has proven he can get more out of a transfer than others expected.

Athletic just cut and paste what some other twitter account posted.

Or they are just not bothering to address twitter nonsense.

Wow what? Have our club said anything regarding a clause? Until they do it's all un-substantiated speculation. Sorry if I require actual proof and not here-say.

Selling MacAllister doesn't prove there was any release clause. It proves we are sticking to our model of not standing in the way of players moving to bigger clubs.