Search results

We turned boats back regularly. https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1819/Quick_Guides/BoatTurnbacksSince2001 That is in violation of international law. That was 2021.

Well given they are under investigation by the EU for data harvesting they might not be available in many nations soon.

So long as that applies to everything. I'm not so sure that many of those in here defending his freedom of speech wouldn't have others locked up for having their freedom of speech.

Thanks for your shit take. I said he shouldn't have faced any kind of nonsense for saying what he did. Can't read? I'd think buy saying he should be able to say what he did implies anyone who said he shouldn't is in the wrong. Yes? No attempt to understand the UK boat policy? I'll go with I...

The bit where he referenced Germany of the 30s was utter bullshit though. Like a clown though instead of making a modern day comparison he goes back to a time when he knows he can imply that a group is doing something similar to a very bad regime even though it's far removed from what was...

Except it's not being used like 1930s Germany. 1930s Germany was not about immigration. 1930s Germany was about anger and resentment from being screwed over from WW1. It was about Lebensraum. They wanted to push out, they had no concern with anything pushing inwardly. If you turn up at the...

So you missed the bit where I also mentioned Bush? We're talking US policy. Too difficult for you to follow?

The Nazis lost seats in 1932 elections which were the last relatively fair and free elections. The 1933 elections saw high levels of violence and massive voter suppression that lead to Hitler gaining power. Not sure that's democratically elected when the elections are impacted by those levels...

Going better than GL's shit take. :thumbsup:

Not in 2023. Not when you're talking about a democratically elected Government that will most likely be voted out next election.

Reuters said swarm. It's almost like its a word journalists might use in such situations too. "SAN LUIS, Ariz (Reuters) - Daily, U.S. Border Patrol agents in this Arizona town faced groups of up to 200 illegal immigrants who would swarm across the border from Mexico, sprinting past the agents...

I disagree. Most people under 40 probably know stuff all about WW2. As soon as you go to the Nazi route you have no where else to go in a discussion. It's a piss weak cowardly route because you're calling them Nazis without actually saying it. I think all he highlighted was Godwin's Law and...

So the kind of language that can be attributed to countless other regimes and Governments in history, many of whom were not right leaning. You can attribute it to poor policy but trying to attribute language to that of a white supremacist regime is f***ing stupid when you have a person of...

That's because I didn't post the whole article. Obama didn't build cages to lock people in because they viewed them as being legal and not committing a crime based on their laws. All of the things you described are not exclusive to "the right". You could link that kind of language to Pol...

The language used is similar to other modern Governments. "Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas recently confirmed that any migrants intercepted by the US Coast Guard off US shores will not be allowed to enter the country — they will be turned back or, if they express fear of...

Nobody misrepresented his tweet, he said similar language used by Germany in the 30's. he chose to compare them to one of the most brutal regimes in past history. There's plenty more modern examples he could have used to compare similar immigration policies but he went full clown and picked the...

Obama deported millions of immigrants, Biden is turning back boats. So was Obama or Joe Biden behaving like the Nazi Party? I'm pretty sure they aren't. But using your theory on what makes ones behaviour mirror the Nazi party maybe they are...