Search results

I know it was, but Chris did the right thing. For the last 20 minutes it looked like an equaliser was a possibility. Pep's team should have done better, but I don't think it was fair to blame us. Yep, but we're a better team now (and I recognise there's every chance we'll get stuffed)

Nah I think you covered it

He also said 'Worst game of football I've ever seen' (or something like that). Not everyone can be as gifted a manager as Shearer.

You say that, but you already had. But I didn't know that when I hit 'post'

But that's not the same, that's the cost of Arsenal's bench, not the value of it. It makes sense to compare the cost of our team with the cost of Grimsby's, but it doesn't make sense to compare an estimated value of our team.

Yep, that's total BS. It could have easily been more, whilst Grimsby never really looked like scoring.

Indeed, just the Mail being crap as always.

And he was dropped by the BBC, but she wasn't. Had she been dropped, for clarifying something from a legal point of view, I imagine she'd have got some support from colleagues too.

Farcical, with zero self awareness.

I don't think it matters whether you're a right wing johnny or whatever, but it's difficult to argue that Lineker should be denied his speech, while others are allowed it. Is anyone arguing that?

You are probably right. I guess we can only support/condemn what's in front of us, and it feels that the BBC were wrong to drop Gary, so that's what I'll react to, rather than what could have been.

So you're role playing at eating the gammons! You're a monster!

Typical gammon

The plot thickens. But it still seems wrong to sensor him whilst allowing so many others on the BBC to post what they like.

But there are so few, that they keep voting the tories in?

I partly agree with you (it is a bit of an echo chamber) but then I also disagree with a lot of the politics said on here, and I often say so. Although I guess I do avoid a lot of the political threads because it does often see that only one opinion there is really accepted. Regardless of...

For being really really crap at his job.

If that's basically correct (and I have no reason to doubt it) then the BBC should just apologise and re-instate him.

Personally I don't mind the BBC saying that it's presenters can't post political opinion, as long as it applies to all presenters. But plenty of their presenters post political opinion.

That's a good point. What's the difference with Lineker posting his opinions?