Search results

Daylight? Questionable, headlights are on and the cyclist is extremely poorly visible, even in the dashcam. Cars fault I agree now I’ve seen the correct angles, but there are things that could have been done to avoid it, just because things aren’t legal requirements doesn’t mean they shouldn’t...

Right I’ve seen the full video now rather than just the cut someone shared and actually I’ve changed my opinion. Drivers fault for the collision as the perspective I saw earlier made the angle of the lanes look different, although I still think him being on the roundabout in the first place...

The first picture shows the cycle alongside/marginally in front of the car and the second shows it hitting the NSF, surely this being the case the bike must have actually been going a fair whack. As far as I can see here the car doesn’t move left at all, in fact it moves more towards the inside...

Unless I’m seeing it wrong look the lines on the road, the car moves left onto the inside of the lane, Walker moves over before the point of impact. Unless the car moved left, how can he have been the fault of the collision? In this situation you’d have to guess an insurer would put not much...

I must confess I’m not sure what you’re looking at, the car hasn’t changed direction dramatically or moved lanes. He’s also not wearing any hi vis at a poorly lit time of day, on a major roundabout at rush hour, plus no arm signal to indicate he’s moving lanes.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11777639/Video-Channel-5s-Dan-Walker-knocked-hit-car-cycling-Sheffield.html#article-11777639 Sorry for the DM link, just saw it shared on twitter but the video evidence from him being ‘knocked off his bike’ is quite revealing. Cycling through the middle...