Search results

there were stories and books about Bletchly Park in the 70's, 30 yrs after the war, Colossus was in text books in the early 90's. the secrecy is exaggerated in programmes about it. here we are 50yrs on from moon landing and no one working on it have claimed fakery, no Russian KGB leak of doubts.

all good reasons to go to the moon. why fake it? you have to suppose that it was some reason unachievable, so faked. so are the rockets, the tech and science all faked too? do we have no space station or satellites either?

... where none are needed. what is the objective to fake moon landing, why do it? why does questioning of the landing arise?

the fun thing about conspiracies usually, they dont answer any question while raising more questions (which is great, leads to more speculative questions and rumination), and secondly they involve organisations trying to achive an aim indirectly that have have the power to act on directly. and...

such a weak argument. tens of thousands of people, none have ever expressed a part in a conspriacy, no dead mans switch to release information. no Russian exposure of their cold war enemy lieing. on the other hand you have UK and Russian scientist that monitored the transmissions, deflectors...

second shot didnt come from the back, that much is certain. there is a credible theory that the fatal shot came from a mis-fired weapon inside the vehicle.

yes, but they wont say.