Search results

big balls surely

Agree , I have not read every comment so had assumed that someone had actually stated that buyback was the cause. As you say who knows. I wonder if it was all of a smoke screen around that guy from Getafe .

Pretty sure he has stated that he would like to make the club self funding so £20million would be a good return on investment. I get the idea that ownership of complete player rights is best option but full ownership does not guarantee that a player will stay. If total control is the issue then...

It's a loan we could have made £20 million on which would have been 40% of all the transfer fees ever received prior to BW sale an even then it would have been 20% and our second highest fee received. Crazy not to have done the deal IF he was the player we wanted. It would have also added...

This does look like one we should have been able to secure but who knows why it didn't work out i.e. we weren't prepared to pay or that he felt Southampton was a better choice..

Thought Bates was supposed to be their best player non-first team shame we could not have got him as well but I guess we can't take them all.