Search results

obviously more fraudulent votes counted. huge evidence of fraud about to be presented in court, any day now.

pfft, those are from biased Democrat judges. the really big cases are just getting ready, you'll see. lots of evidence coming. :moo:

still waiting for the court cases with evidence of all the fraud. any day now i'm sure.

always has been.

silly Trump, forgot the court case to have ballot legality decided. im sure there's a case with the evidence pending that shows this. any day now.

had wondered when they'd work out the result of a recount. still managing to keep the comedy show rolling on, still no evidence of anything in a court.

we're just waiting on the evidence. no one sensible could believe US law firms would back away from well funded, evidence backed law suits. evidence usually optional if sufficiently funded.

you can mess with their head by pointing out all health insurance is socialised medicine, collective funding of services. mutual funds are socialised ownership of stocks and assets too.

you missed the one about needing binoculars to watch the vote.

does seem something like the plan. though fatal flaw is some of the contentious states would send democrat delegates, so probably wouldnt get enough votes.

sure, they can decide points of law, after they go through state courts first and there is something open to interpretation. case has already been lost where SC found the state law was being followed. in several states the Trump camp has to challenge republicans running the election and battle...

the Supreme Court cant decide the election. they could weigh in on a few cases, leading to some local recounts. or as an outlier they could agree with states sending Trump supporting electors to electoral colleges, if they decide to and legal to do so under their legislation. many things need...

the red on red internal warfare has begun, republican state senators in Georgia calling for resignation of the republican Secretary of State, for mismanagement of the election. he in turn says they should focus on their re-election run-offs (didnt get 50% so another vote in January). :drama:

queer ist it? that alone invalidates their claims morally and probably affect any legal view.

exactly, and thats going way too far. another election isnt an option. Supreme Court has no power to force one, they adjudicate on points of law. they might be partisan on matter of principle or moral views, its unlikely they will want to become overtly political and directly interfere with...

in some states. quite happy about postal voting in Texas, Florida, Alaska and so on. fun thing is, as pointed out in Vox video earlier, in at least one contentious state, Pennsylvania, they lost before the postal ballots were counted.

though no pocket revolutionary, i'll offer you the Glorious Revolution 1688, William of Orange takes over the monarch of England. worked out pretty well.

sure, if they want to go nuclear and undermine the basic tenets of democratic votes. it doesn't even need supreme court, the local republican legislatures would apply the changes. and democratic legislatures would follow suit in their favour. as it stands its local law that enforces popular...

there comes a point where the future becomes more important, an eye to next round of congress elections and the next presidential election. how many moderate republicans and floating voters do you lose if Trump is trying to subvert the outcome of the election? its clear the best he can achieve...

some constitutional expert said on day of inauguration Biden becomes president, Trump is a guest in the White House. and at that point the Secret Service eject him as an unwanted guest.