Search results

Probably just as well he isn't getting involved in anything to do with the Toxic Substances Control Act. Nice to see Trump promised to do something about those nasty chemicals... and has a month or so to follow through on that promise. Then it is over to Biden and HIS promise...

The system is rigged against them! Massive fraud*! We have evidence! The Pennsylvania Judge, Judge Matthew Brann**, was an Obama appointee! It's a conspiracy! * No fraud has been claimed in court proceedings. ** Judge Matthew Brann is a Republican.

And he was so good at it, not only did he rig the machines in Georgia but he managed to rig the people doing the manual recount too! :eek:

No, apparently Venezuela rigged the election... or something...

Did Giuliani just slander Biden?

He pulls it out of his arse with all the other bollocks he talks. Pinocchio would be embarrassed by the lies President Trump has told. He is without doubt the biggistest liarer in all of American history, he could claim that on Twitter without it getting fact-checked.

Wow, I just checked Twitter, and that is actually genuine. The man needs some help.

Wasn't that the one that Trump's (now former) pet news channel, Fox News, called first? :lolol:

BBC News - US election security officials reject Trump's fraud claims https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2020-54926084

They probably should have pointed this out to President Trump before they started down this route...

From what I've read it seems that the Trump legal team (note the the Republican party don't appear to be taking part in the legal action) seem to be heading towards the route of trying to get postal voting declared illegal. Quite scary when you think about it, they want to "protect" the...

I thought I'd share this rather comprehensive fact check on Trump's tweets. https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-ap-fact-check-joe-biden-donald-trump-virus-outbreak-79c34b72633683af195ae945503883fe Good work the Associated Press.

The article is even annotated, presumably by the editor, to say that there is as yet no actual evidence of voting fraud. It is an opinion piece at best.

You really are clutching at straws. People do turn out when they are motivated to do so. The 2016 EU referendum had a 72.2% turnout, so was presumably fraudulent by your standards too? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/politics/eu_referendum/results No apologies for not posting a YouTube link.

Let's keep Crystal Palace to the football threads, please.

He did blow up that Iranian General though, that could very easily have started a war.

"There is a great, and massively, postal voting fraud" "We'd better investigate that, what evidence do you have?" "They say it's fraudulent" "Who do?" "Them, I saw it on YouTube" "Right, and the evidence..?"

Indeed, in fact the argument was more about how close the observers were being allowed to the count... and when they said that their observers weren't being allowed in there were in fact 19 of them...

Not the latest one then, that is scheduled for 5:30 their time. This election has been like watching a car crash... and I can't stop watching it in horror.

Is that from the emergency hearing they've just been granted?