Search results

The report covers COVID and cancer treatment and not any argument about who should be treated. I’m not either. It identifies that will be a problem further down the line. This is just cancer and doesn’t include other life threatening conditions. Sadly another ticking time bomb. Sent from my...

That is not up for debate and as far as I’m aware ever was? You implied that people prematurely dying of cancer due COVID was a greatly exaggerated story on Facebook. It clearly isn’t. How many of 36,000 with greatly reduced life spans will die in the next couple of years or is it that not...

The lancet paper I quoted isn’t Facebook. 3000 will directly die due to lack of treatment, a further 36,000 will have a significant reduction in life expectancy. Both these figures are low end. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Below is an attract from a paper published in the Lancet last month on effects of COVID on cancer treatment. Bottom line is that at least 3000 people will die because they didn’t receive treatment due to COVID precautions. We estimated that across the four major tumour types, breast...

Thank **** for that. Every cloud has a silver lining. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Johnson, Hancock, Gove and Cummings ... the four ****wits of the apocalypse. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk