Search results

I don't remember now if it was one of the articles I linked to above or one of the others I saw while putting it together but it noted that there wasn't as much or as extreme wealth inequality in Sweden, and even then it did harm the poorer in the short term (I didn't catch the specifics, I was...

I didn't realise the amex existed in isolation, unaffected by and not effecting the world in which it exists.

I do not consider myself rich, but I able to live my life without a constant worry of how I'm going to pay for my next meal, I can afford luxuries and treats and am sure there are section of society that would say I am. Going cashless at the amex will not affect me. But I am aware that the move...

I'm a hero. :salute:

It's not simply about not affording something, it's about keeping track of spending, so you are aware of the moment you go from 'I can afford this' to 'I can't afford this'. If you've got a tenner in your pocket at the start of the day, you know when you've spent it. If you've got a card, you...

Cashless unfairly impacts on poorer people. There's the ability to have a card, or a card that has sufficient funds to use. Money advice service always talk about budgeting, which is harder to do when you're not handling actual money and it's all digital. Having said that, since the flask ban...