Search results

Looks like our 'no dickheads' policy is alive and kicking. Reports that we did our due diligence and were looking for character references for Webster over the summer, before lodging a bid: 1157248580207464449

1157220645106855936

On The Argus website now:- https://www.theargus.co.uk/sport/17811943.albion-agree-fee-adam-webster/

He's back, but still recovering from an ACL injury. It'll take him a while to get match fit.

Don't disagree that we need a right-back. However, we do have Schelotto due back in a few months - so that could be why the club aren't making the position a priority. However, it is a very risky strategy going into the season with only Montoya as an out-and-out right-back in the short-term.

1156969204337324033

1156210381699932160 I'm sure that there is logic to our transfer policy, but I'm not sure I understand it at this moment. Does this mean that Webster is not being brought in to replace Dunk, or are the two unrelated?

Suttner has already gone. Schelotto unlikely to go anywhere, unless we actually bid for another right-back

1156134703142977536